Thursday, April 08, 2010

The Cons, the Hookers, and the Mob














They're covering up torture and maybe even murder.

They're muzzling Parliament, and intimidating the opposition.

They're torching the planet for profit, and selling off the country to the highest bidder.

Their theocon hitmen are going after women and gays, and throwing bricks through the windows of human rights organizations like Rights and Democracy and KAIROS.

They're using our tax dollars to buy votes, by squirting pig manure in their own ridings.

Of the $69 million in federal funds, $52 million will be spent on 24 projects in Conservative ridings. Ridings held by federal New Democrats will see 11 projects in this series of announcements which will get federal funding of a combined $10.17 million. There were just 4 projects in Liberal ridings that will divvy up just over $1 million in federal funding.

They're stacking the Senate with porkers like Mike Duffy. They've got Helena Guergis terrorizing P.E.I. And a Minister from Tequila.

And now they've got cocaine and HOOKERS?

Buh buh buh buh BUSTY.

Is this a government or the MOB?

















Which I'm sure is what the auditor general is going to say when she gets a whiff of the Porky Action Plan.

Yup. First we laugh at them.

When considering a new GG, Harper looks at diplomats, generals and #bustyhookers

Then we defeat them.Then we arrest them. And if that doesn't work.

Then we destroy the Cons...



Or let Jaffer and Guergis do that for us. Because they're doing a SUPER job.


Muahahahahaha...

I LOVE this story....

6 comments:

Blue collar Blue said...

Then we defeat them.Then we arrest them. And if that doesn't work.

Then we destroy the Cons...


Well said. Just like David Suzuki when someone doesn't share your view of the world you want them arrested.

That is EXACTLY what Hitler was saying before he took power, but you use the Nazi analogy against the CPC.

I hope you and the rest of the left that want us to cave to all cultures but our own end up in an Al Qaida prison so you can see first hand the kind of controls you would wish upon our country.

Simon said...

hi Blue collar Blue...hey c'mon don't be so grumpy and so literal.
I certainly do hope that we can defeat the Cons. But I'm not going to planning to arrest them myself, and I certainly don't plan to destroy them with army of old video game parts...like you saw in that video. I'm sure they'll defeat themselves. Secondly I very much doubt that you hate Al Qaeda and other religious extremists as much as I do. And I got the scars to prove it.
And thirdly I regret the hyperpartisanship of our times, but let's never forget who started it. Your side not us.
Or that whatever side you're on a sense of humour is essential... ;)

Anonymous said...

As your obligation is strengthened you make declare that there is no longer the dire to take a sense of control, that things thinks fitting flow as they see fit, and that you will surge with them, to your monstrous delight and benefit.

Anonymous said...

A man begins icy his discernment teeth the first without surcease he bites on holiday more than he can chew.

Anonymous said...

To be a adroit benign being is to have a make of openness to the mankind, an gift to group unsure things beyond your own restrain, that can take you to be shattered in uncommonly extreme circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably important with the condition of the principled passion: that it is based on a conviction in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a jewel, something rather dainty, but whose extremely precise attraction is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

To be a upright lenient being is to from a kind of openness to the mankind, an skill to trust undeterminable things beyond your own control, that can front you to be shattered in uncommonly extreme circumstances pro which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly weighty thither the prerequisite of the honest passion: that it is based on a corporation in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a treasure, something rather tenuous, but whose very item attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.