Friday, March 20, 2015

Stephen Harper and the Night of the Living Dead



As you probably remember, when I saw that Stephen Harper had poured gasoline on the flames of bigotry in Quebec, and I saw how his words had galvanized the Bloc Québécois.

I portrayed him as the man who had helped bring the Bloc back from the dead.

And I knew that it wouldn't be long before other zombies would stagger out to take advantage of the situation.

And sure enough out of his PQ crypt came Pierre Karl Péladeau. 



Parti Quebecois leadership hopeful Pierre Karl Peladeau apologized on Thursday after saying a day earlier that immigration was hurting the sovereignty movement. 

On Wednesday, Peladeau said during a PQ leadership debate that immigration was hurting the goal of Quebec independence. “We don’t have 25 years ahead of us to achieve it,” he said. “With demographics, with immigration, we’re definitely losing one riding each year.”


And although he has apologized, there are two things everybody needs to know: 

One, Pierre Karl the billionaire always says what he feels. And in a province and a country where polls show many share his views about immigration, you haven't heard the last of that one.

And two, a simple apology doesn't extinguish the flames of bigotry. Those who are receptive to that kind of dog whistle heard it. The only thing that shocked them is that he apologized.

And a fire of that kind is always easier to start than it is to put out. So his words ring hollow, and so does Stephen Harper's condemnation.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s office also weighed in on the debate. “We believe that most Quebecers reject sovereignty, but believe that an even greater majority of Quebecers reject that kind of nationalism, as articulated by Mr Peladeau,” said an emailed statement from the PMO.

Because Tom Mulcair is right, Péladeau is only playing Harper's game.

“Mr. Peladeau is using the same strategy as Stephen Harper,” Mulcair said. “And it’s really too bad. “Just like Stephen Harper, he is pitting Canadians against each other and saying the vote of certain people in our extraordinary country, certain Quebecers, have more rights than others.

And Michael Harris is also right. It is the return of the night, or the right of the living dead.  



Although it seems like ages since a protester drenched Stockwell Day in two quarts of chocolate milk, the evidence is mounting that Reform and Canadian Alliance zombies have crawled out of their shallow graves and are shambling across the landscape once more.

And what is also true is that when Stephen Harper blows his bigot whistle, or calls on some to become vigilantes, in the explanation is also buried the message.

This is Harperland, where the words mean what the man says they mean. The PM insisted it was “patently ridiculous” to interpret his words as an incitement to vigilante acts. Why? Because all he was trying to do was show that the Conservative Party of Canada was pro-gun owner, while the other parties are clearly anti-. The words themselves meant nothing; the sentiment was everything.

It is all about inflaming emotion. It is all calculated.

Harper has simply made the calculation that if the way to give a chameleon a nervous breakdown is to put him down on plaid, the way to win an election in our disappearing democracy is to offer Canadians only two flavours — vanilla or chocolate. 

That means hitting the hot buttons, over and over. Before oil prices tanked, greed was the button of choice. Now it’s fear. It makes things starkly simple — black and white, good and evil.

And this is the burning question:



As simple as War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery … and Ignorance is Strength. It’s a campaign designed for Idiot Culture. The only question is, are there enough idiots out there to put Harper over the top again?

And it's a question I can't answer, even with all I know about Canadian and Québécois politics. I don't think anybody can. Because there are all kinds of demons and zombies stalking the land, and it's not the same country it was just a few months ago. 

Then it was bad, now it's a living nightmare. So anything could happen.

But what I'm sure of is this: Pierre Karl Péladeau could one day become the biggest threat to a united Canada this country has ever seen.

And that if Stephen Harper and his ghastly Cons are not defeated in the next election, they will destroy our Canada...



Fight fear, fight bigotry, fight those monstrous zombies.

If this country is to live.

Don't let them win...

Please click here to recommend this post at Progressive Bloggers.

12 comments:

  1. Contrary to silly pundits like Wells and Coyne. Harper did have a hidden agenda. We are seeing the proof now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi rumleyfips...it should have been clear from the days of the coalition crisis that Harper was a dangerous demagogue. But the MSM and so many other Canadians insisted that it couldn't happen here. They gave him a free ride for too long and here we are now...

      Delete
  2. Stephen Harper in league with the separatists has a certain ring to it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi Kev...you mean Ol' Firewall? Of course he's only too happy to see the Bloc come back from the dead because it can only further divide the opposition vote. Fortunately from what I hear, the Bloc's rise is more illusion than anything. But Peladeau and Harper would be a very bad combination, for it's hard to tell who is more right-wing, whatever Pierre Karl may pose as today. I've known quite a few lefty PQ members and they must be horrified...

      Delete
  3. I've known all along that Harper would bring on the Zombie Apocalypse, but I pictured it differently. I had visions of millions of real Conservatives, who have been spinning in their graves since he stole the name, would rise and shamble towards Parliament Hill. "Brains!" they would call out..."Brains!" Sadly, they would find little sustenance on the government side of the House...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi Punned It...well I would definitely support an invasion by the old Conservatives to get their party back. I wouldn't ever vote for them, but I wouldn't fear that they would destroy the country, as I fear Harper may do if he gets another term in office...

      Delete
  4. Harper has shifty eyes......ever notice. Of course he has his own agenda........being saying this for years. I so feel sorry for his wife and kids! O yes, and the pets!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi Kathleen...I once had the misfortune to get close enough to him to see his eyes staring at me so cold and so dead they sent a chill down my back. Some psychopaths can pass for warm human beings, but he definitely can't...

      Delete
  5. Great post, particularly your point about "hitting hot buttons over and over".
    We may laugh at those "Please send $15" Con fundraising emails microtargeting particular prejudices/POVs, but donating even a small amount contributes to a sense of having made an investment in an issue and by extension with those who share it. It's a formidable strategy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi Alison...thank you. And yes there is no doubt the Cons do have a formidable fundraising machine. And that's a very good point. I sometimes think of the Con base as suckers, but you're right it is an excellent way to make them feel that their opinions count. But the tactics the Cons use to drain them of their dollars couldn't be more appalling. I am a bit puzzled however at the amount of effort the Cons are putting into pleasing their base, because it makes me thin that there must be some kind of erosion happening. And of course they can't afford to lose any of them...

      Delete
  6. What are the odds that during the election campaign the RCMP will announce they have arrested (or brought in for questioning) some "jihadists" who they have been following for several months or even years.

    Nah, that would never happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi David...I would be shocked but not surprised. The RCMP has been very helpful to the Cons since this terrorist scare began. And let's not forget they were instrumental in deterring the result of one election, so it could happen again...

      Delete