Friday, August 25, 2017

Andrew Scheer and the Creepy Bigot Party



For weeks the creepy Con Andrew Scheer has been tap dancing across Canada trying to convince Canadians that he's really a nice guy.

Or as he likes to call himself Mr Positivity.

After stabbing his country in the back in the manner of a traitor...



But Scheer's Mr Nice Guy act was always going to be just a shabby show.

There is nothing nice or decent about that sinister religious fanatic, and now The Creeper is back to doing what he does best.



Posing as Mr Compassionate, or Jimbo Jesus, while stirring up racism for crass political purposes just like the Harper Cons did.

Even though Canada's immigration system is not broken. Even though our country can handle the latest surge in asylum seekers. Even though deportation numbers are soaring. 

And Justin Trudeau is right to say that Canada's message hasn't changed. 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau maintained Wednesday that his message for those hoping to find refuge in Canada has stayed consistent, even as rivals accused him of misleading asylum seekers.



And by targeting that message, which was sent out the day after Donald Trump sent out this racist message.

The ghastly Michelle Rempel is also playing the Con's dirty game all over again...



Rempel said Trudeau's #WelcomeToCanada tweet launched a "a number of ships" in terms of global news stories contrasting Canada to the U.S. 

 "I absolutely think that set the tone," Rempel said. "Man, was that ever irresponsible."

Even though Trudeau's message couldn't be clearer: if you are fleeing PERSECUTION, TERRORISM, or WAR, Canada will welcome you.

If you're not, you will be sent back. 

And Trudeau was only upholding our precious Canadian values. The values the monstrous Harper Cons violated over and over again.

And the only reason Scheer and his hideous Cons are beating that monstrous drum again is to try to profit from racism, just like their beautiful Rebel is doing...



Which as you know the Cons loved and humped and sucked so much it took forever to separate them. 

Conservative politicians have also hurriedly backed away from Levant and The Rebel but only after they were publicly shamed into it. Why did it take so long?

How could any decent politician or journalist appear on, agree to be interviewed by, or place ads on Levant’s platform knowing what he has been doing for years? Why would they encourage this sort of dreck? 

It’s not about right or left, it’s about right and wrong.

Did the conservative politicians not see that? Or did they simply not care?

And Andrew Scheer has still to condemn The Rebel or Ezra Levant by name.

But that is who the Cons are, the bigot party, still trying to follow in the steps of their depraved fallen leader Stephen Harper...



And always ready to violate our Canadian values for crass political purposes.

Racism is a powerful force. It elected Trump, it fuelled Britain disastrous decision to leave the E.U., and if left unchecked it will destroy this country.

The asylum seeker "crisis" should be over in a couple of months, as word gets out that most of them are being deported.

But we should always remember what Andrew Scheer and his creepy Bigot Party tried to do...



Use racism to try to make themselves more popular.

And destroy him and his filthy racist Cons in the next election...

24 comments:

  1. Anonymous11:08 AM

    This man is much more sinister than even Harper.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi anon...I honestly believe he is for two main reasons: (1) Scheer is far more of a religious fanatic and right-wing than Stephen Harper. (2) His smile and apparent friendliness conceal his inner kook.
      And the good news, a group I know and admire has done the required research, and when they release their findings, Scheer will be gone quicker than you can say jumping Jimbo Jesus...

      Delete
  2. Anonymous12:21 PM

    The Harper government ran a racist election campaign, their leadership campaign was as racist as could be, so Scheer and Rempel and all the others are just more of the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:39 PM

      Race is just a social construct. Given the same circumstances a man from subsuharan Africa would be just as successful and intelligent as a white man from England. The only reason there are more white male inventors is because women and people of colour have been oppressed.

      Delete
    2. Hi anon. 12:21 pm...you're absolutely right, and it tells you how useless are those in the MSM who can't put two and two together. What do Canadians know about Scheer's past as a right-wing extremist, and who is to blame for that?

      Delete
    3. Hi anon...yes, race is a social construct. It's just an excuse for some to declare themselves superior to others. When in fact if you open people up in an operating room we are all the same inside. It's just prejudice, it's insane, and it's evil...

      Delete
  3. Anonymous12:34 PM

    No one is born racist. So it begs the question why are there so many racist people out there? Are people noticing patterns and then basing prejudices on that? Or is it simply an irrational hatred for the colour of one's darker skin?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi anon....you're so right, nobody is born racist. Obama recently tweeted out that message with a lovely picture of three toddlers in a window. One white, one Asian, and one black.
      It was simply beautiful, and it made me think, how boring this world would be if we all looked the same...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:58 AM

      No one is born religious either. But scientific studies have found that the more religious a person is, the more likely he or she is going to be racist, and the less religious he or she is, the less likely.

      Now correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation, and you'll certainly find bigoted atheists, as well as religious people who strongly oppose all forms of bigotry and fight against them. Indeed, most of the major religions teach people to love one another.

      But, religion creates an "in group" of believers who defend their faith against "out groups." One of the easiest ways to do this is to dehumanize people outside the faith, especially people from groups that the faith already condemns in some way - e.g. Christians blame Jews for killing Christ, women for the fall from the Garden of Eden, gays for the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and blacks as cursed. Most religious groups also prioritize tradition and are deeply suspicious of anything new, so they see gay marriage and changing societal values as a threat.

      The irreligious, on the other hand, deny the value of faith and demand empirical evidence of the supernatural. They have no need to defend their faith since they have none, so they may be less likely to dehumanize others. This is just a guess that merits further investigation, but it does fit the observed evidence.

      Delete
  4. Replies
    1. Anonymous9:55 PM

      Just like the Joker before him.

      "Justin... why so tolerant...?"

      Delete
    2. Hi Political Junkie...he is indeed, and it tells you how messed up the Cons are that so many of them think that is a compliment. Let them cling to that illusion and they will go down with it...

      Delete
    3. Hi anon 9:55 pm....I'm not quite sure what you're saying. But I do believe that in a world killing itself with hate, tolerance is something to celebrate, and the only hope we have of saving our precious planet...

      Delete
  5. Well, there are probably all sorts of causes but a likely major one is people needed to justify their behaviour in exploiting black slaves when the the Atlantic African slave-trade took off in the late 15th and early 16th Century. Claiming African inferiority helped justify the horrible treatment that slave-owners meted out to their slaves. Call it a massive attack of cognitive dissonance. Over time this sense of superiority became an accepted cultural belief.

    Interestingly, I have seen some suggestions that the Ancient World (i.e. the Mediterranean world) was not racist. I am sure the Ancients had lots of prejudices but apparently not race.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi jrkrideau...it's an interesting question, and slavery is racism's most disgusting form, but sadly it's more widespread than that. There is a lot of racism in Japan, and even in beautiful multiracial Brazil (one of my favourite countries) darker black people are discriminated against by lighter ones. As I said above, how boring it would be if we all looked the same...

      Delete
    2. The Intercept has an interesting take on the Alt-scum and Nazis in at least the USA/
      https://theintercept.com/2017/08/25/video-how-white-nationalism-became-normal-online/

      Delete
    3. Well Brazil only abolished slavery in 1888. Purely coincidentally I'm sure, there was a coup d'état and the empire was overthrown in 1889.

      Cuba, reportedly, is fairly racist. Fidel Cuba has been reported as saying that the Revolution completely underestimated the staying power of racism. They thought that they just has to pass some anti-discrimination laws and everything would work out okay.

      No idea what if anything they did after realizing their mistake.

      Japan, Korea, China(Han) all may just discriminate against any outsider---possibly more a tribalism reaction than a true racist one? Japan and Korea, in particular, were and are highly homogeneous nations.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous6:19 PM

    Michelle Rempel must be trying to be Canada's Marine Le Pen. She should ask Scheer to be remove her as immigration critic before she ruins what is left of her political career.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi anon....I've mentioned this before, but when Rempel first appeared on the scene I was hopeful that she would be a new and better kind of Con. And she does have some good qualities. But ever since she became an immigration critic she has really gone downhill. She really needs to get her act together before it's too late...

      Delete
  7. Anonymous6:37 PM

    Scheer is an unctuous little prick.

    BM

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi BM....yes, that would be a good description, and What I fear is that many Canadians might be fooled by that and his creepy grin. Now, I must admit that I often have a goofy grin on my face, which I try to explain is my way of coping with the horror of this world. But unlike Scheer my grin disappears when I am confronted with bullies and bigotry, and I'm not trying to fool anyone about anything...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous12:20 AM

    Michelle Rempel should look in the mirror and ask herself why she appeared on the Rebel so many times when she knew full well that it was a hate spewing racist site. That's not only irresponsible, it's deplorable.
    As for the leader of the Alt-Right, Andrew Scheer, he can keep blowing things out of context just like his douchebag-in-arms Harper did and we'll see what that gets him.
    These clowns just dont know when to quit Simon. I guess when you're that inherently hateful it just becomes natural after a while.
    JD

    ReplyDelete
  10. John B.1:56 AM

    It might have been clearer if Justin had included the "If you're not, you'll be sent back" part in the original communication. The omission might have been reflexive, or maybe he was in too much of a hurry. He could have put it in a separate tweet.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous2:15 PM

    he makes my skin crawl.

    ReplyDelete