tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23253782.post1810439955355409559..comments2024-03-03T17:01:57.876-05:00Comments on Montreal Simon: The Con Plot to Destroy CanadaSimonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15309809679331128837noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23253782.post-9972627794559230382009-06-03T22:55:42.481-04:002009-06-03T22:55:42.481-04:00Hi Oemissions...it's a beautiful word isn'...Hi Oemissions...it's a beautiful word isn't it? Remind me to order two t-shirts for you... :)Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15309809679331128837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23253782.post-66769412985117542802009-06-03T22:54:47.055-04:002009-06-03T22:54:47.055-04:00Hi Omar...no problem...I'll put you down for c...Hi Omar...no problem...I'll put you down for couple from the Montreal Simon store. How would you like yours? Blood red or shocking pink? :)<br />Seriously though it is a rather striking poster. They were all over my Montreal neighbourhood during the last election.<br />If I see another one I think I'll pinch it and start ironing up those shirts...Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15309809679331128837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23253782.post-49219072652255018832009-06-03T22:51:26.638-04:002009-06-03T22:51:26.638-04:00Hi Torontonian...you're right but then it shou...Hi Torontonian...you're right but then it should be obvious to everyone by now that the Cons are making it up as they go along.<br />You know as worried as I am about the size of the deficit, because we'll be paying for it FOREVER.<br />What really troubles me is that the Cons have obviously realized that they can use a huge deficit to do what they always wanted.i.e. destroy the power of government.<br />You know brutally speaking it doesn't really matter who is in power when you spend the money, it's who is in power when you have to pay it back that counts. It better not be the Cons...Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15309809679331128837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23253782.post-59522821206449233512009-06-03T02:51:59.614-04:002009-06-03T02:51:59.614-04:00RESIST!!RESIST!!Oemissionshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15052778663890940687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23253782.post-22534840415164402232009-06-02T20:27:51.416-04:002009-06-02T20:27:51.416-04:00Where can I get a 'RESIST' T-shirt?!Where can I get a 'RESIST' T-shirt?!Omarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12058734544373976550noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23253782.post-26434735690895875802009-06-02T17:18:45.918-04:002009-06-02T17:18:45.918-04:00" . . . The feds are not only airily mulling an as..." . . . The feds are not only airily mulling an asset sale in the abstract, they’ve booked revenue from it in this budget year, and in succeeding years, to the tune of many billions of dollars in total sales. . . . "<br />--------<br /><br />The concept of reporting anticipated revenues happened once before in recent business history.<br /><br />It was called ENRON Remember it?<br /><br />Where is Enron today? Actually it's in the same place as Harper and gang shall be come the next election.<br /><br />Really, how can you report anticipated revenues from a sale that hasn't yet happened?<br /><br />Oh yeah, that's Reaganesque laissez-faire economics all over again. It's as welcome as dog turds on the front lawn.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com